<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Postal Sanity &#187; Electronic Mail Technology Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalsanity.com/category/electronic-mail-technology-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalsanity.com</link>
	<description>(SM)...our blog...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Table of worldwide Paperless Mail Providers</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2011/03/table-of-worldwide-paperless-mail-providers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2011/03/table-of-worldwide-paperless-mail-providers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opportunities for USPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest version of the table can be downloaded here. (right click &#8211; save as) We updated the table as follows: Version 1.5: (March-31st-2011) Added Volly/USA, PosteCS/Canada and digiposte/France Added Accenture Digital Mail, Manilla/USA, Doxo/USA some smaller edits Services listed in table are: Apartado Postal Electronico / Spain SafeMail /Ireland Mein Brief.atRaiffeisen / Austria Post, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2011/03/table-of-worldwide-paperless-mail-providers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Switching to Digital Mail: Keeping control of paper mail stream may ease consumer reluctance</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2011/03/switching-to-digital-mail-keeping-control-of-paper-mail-stream-may-ease-consumers-reluctance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2011/03/switching-to-digital-mail-keeping-control-of-paper-mail-stream-may-ease-consumers-reluctance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Declining letter volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=2050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several digital mail providers compete for their share of the digital transactional mail business. Manilla has just sent out e-mails to pre-registered consumers to inform them that &#8220;the Manilla private beta has officially launched&#8221;. Alas, the &#8220;private&#8221; Beta phase is not so private after all and Manilla tweeted the launch, advertising a $5000 sweep-stake amongst [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2011/03/switching-to-digital-mail-keeping-control-of-paper-mail-stream-may-ease-consumers-reluctance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paperless Mail: Expectations for rapid success not in near future according to DVPT</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/06/paperless-mail-expectations-for-rapid-success-not-in-near-future-according-to-dvpt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/06/paperless-mail-expectations-for-rapid-success-not-in-near-future-according-to-dvpt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The German Association for Post, IT and Telecommunication (DVPT) has polled its members (enterprises and public institutions) about their planned usage of the upcoming digital paperless mail systems, E-Postbrief and De-Mail. Only 20% of the companies are considering implementation of paperless mail within the next 12 months. 23% are generally not planning any future implementation. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/06/paperless-mail-expectations-for-rapid-success-not-in-near-future-according-to-dvpt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advent of the iPad: Apple will take a bite out of direct mail volumes</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/06/advent-of-the-ipad-apple-will-take-a-bite-out-of-direct-mail-volumes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/06/advent-of-the-ipad-apple-will-take-a-bite-out-of-direct-mail-volumes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=1332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Within 10 years, and contrary to some pep talks in the direct mail industry, we foresee that future tablet devices will take a measurable bite out of paper-based direct mail volumes. Ever improving iPad-class devices will become a very attractive vehicle for targeted sensible advertising. The key to sensible advertising is to avoid flooding the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/06/advent-of-the-ipad-apple-will-take-a-bite-out-of-direct-mail-volumes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Pitney Bowes pull a rabbit out of the hat at the upcoming National Postal Forum?</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/04/will-pitney-bowes-pull-a-rabbit-out-of-the-hat-at-the-upcoming-national-postal-forum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/04/will-pitney-bowes-pull-a-rabbit-out-of-the-hat-at-the-upcoming-national-postal-forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=1288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In October 2009, zumbox was being sued by Pitney Bowes over various alleged patent infringements. At the time zumbox was making quite some headlines with their paperless mail offering, especially when some major cities signed up with the zumbox service. Since then, we haven&#8217;t heard of any news indicating that the lawsuit has been resolved. Some days ago [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/04/will-pitney-bowes-pull-a-rabbit-out-of-the-hat-at-the-upcoming-national-postal-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Direct Mail Marketing headaches with paperless mail</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/02/direct-marketing-headaches-with-paperless-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/02/direct-marketing-headaches-with-paperless-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mailing industry experts do agree that paper based mail volumes will continue to fall. Especially first class mail, a big money maker, is affected by this decline. Part of the decline is due to the economy, but according to Deutsche Post the better part of this decline is caused by the Internet. As this development continues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/02/direct-marketing-headaches-with-paperless-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>La poste, c&#8217;est moi!  &#8212; I&#8217;m the postal service</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/01/la-poste-cest-moi-im-the-postal-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/01/la-poste-cest-moi-im-the-postal-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Declining letter volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The future of national postal services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With this classy statement Swiss Post chairman Claude Begle managed to upset some of his fellow mountain dwellers, which are kind and modest people and not used to such sacrilegious self-congratulations. &#8220;L&#8217;etat, c&#8217;est moi&#8221; (I am the state) said Louis XIV, known as the French sun king. Logic almost dictates that Claude Begle could now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2010/01/la-poste-cest-moi-im-the-postal-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Licensing of paperless mail technologies: The right tool for the right job</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/12/licensing-of-paperless-mail-technologies-the-right-tool-for-the-right-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/12/licensing-of-paperless-mail-technologies-the-right-tool-for-the-right-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The future of national postal services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=1000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The change is coming Paper based mail has been very successful for a long time by providing a multitude of satisfactory services for senders and recipients. Transactional mailings, certified mail, return receipt, direct mail, personal messages and many other services are so far been well taken care of within the traditional paper based mail systems. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/12/licensing-of-paperless-mail-technologies-the-right-tool-for-the-right-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deutsche Post goes digital</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/11/deutsche-post-goes-digital-rather-than-postal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/11/deutsche-post-goes-digital-rather-than-postal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Declining letter volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The future of national postal services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deutsche Post has released some more info about the coming Online-Letter (&#8220;Online-Brief&#8221;) product. It is due to start in the first half of 2010, the price structuring is yet unknown. Deutsche Post says that flat rates or per-piece pricing, or both, could be possible. German newspapers indicate that the price would be less than 10 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/11/deutsche-post-goes-digital-rather-than-postal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>zumbox vs. NoMorePost (part2)</title>
		<link>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/11/zumbox-vs-nomorepost-part2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/11/zumbox-vs-nomorepost-part2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Mail Technology Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalsanity.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first part of our comparison we concluded that more convenient bill payment options are needed for US based operations, and that zumbox seems potentially more prone to &#8220;junk mail&#8221; than NoMorePost. What follows is a closer look at the cost of paperless mailings, and for that we will distinguish between transactional mailings (bills, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalsanity.com/2009/11/zumbox-vs-nomorepost-part2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.846 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-07 13:48:21 -->

